The 24mm F3.5, 35mm F2 and 65mm F2 DG DN share similar designs and have weather-sealed metal bodies. Also try to not sound like a Canon rep. Your point is correct. You can push the bitrate to 28Mbps when shooting in AVCHD in 1080p60, and you have the option of 17Mbps or 24Mbps when rolling at 1080i60 or 1080p24. Voting ran through January 20th and the results are in! Keep an eye on your inbox! By that time Sony will already have a far more advanced camera that leaves the competition far behind again. There's some grain at ISO 3200, and at ISO 6400 the grain becomes very noticeable and the lines of our test scene start to blend together, just not as severely as in a comparable JPG. The LCD is mounted on a hinge; that means it can tilt down so you can use the RX above your head, and can face all the way forward for selfies. If yes, is the picture quality compromised and if yes how much compromise in percentage?If any one can answer, thank you. Hi, I'd like to ask existing users of the RX100M3 if they have used the monochrome modes and what there experience was with these modes. Surprisingly, dp review really does not offer much in the way of macro mode performance as part of the review process. They're familiar. A quarter of those dots are there for luminosity only, which makes the screen very bright and easy to see outdoors. For the sake of competition I hope they get to work to build something with being interested in. It costs a lot more (around $1000) than the RX100 III (Amazon, Newegg and Hardware.eu sell it for $700-800). He studied at RPI and worked on the retail side of the industry at B&H before landing at PCMag. I wear Glasses too, and I didn't have a problem either. Lastly, if you wear glasses or are in need of readers it makes seeing things a lot easier too. The end result is that I'll hang on to the MII indefinitely and until Sony hopefully reintroduces the hot shoe on the MIV???. MIOPS has announced Flex, a new smart camera gadget designed to make it easy and simple to capture lightning strikes, action images, holy grail timelapse videos and much more. Add a tilting LCD, a wide-aperture zoom lens, a sharp rear LCD, and Wi-Fi, and you've got a real winner. Frankly, other than resolution I wouldn't trade my Sony R1 for this new RX-100 III if the best it can do for IQ is what you have posted in the review samples. The image of Sony at 800ASA has a noise that Fuji doesn’t show at 1600ASA; and the sharpness of X100, at each aperture or all ASA value, is quite greater than RX100.M3. I also get great pics with an I phone. The RX100 III has a larger sensor and bigger pixels. At its widest angle and aperture it exceeds the 1,800 lines per picture height that we require to call an image sharp. With a 1.8x squeeze, the lens produces a more pronounced anamorphic effect than the 1.33x lenses offered by Sirui, albeit at a much higher cost. Dont raise the flash and nobody will see or hear you snapping away!! Having only just purchased this camera,(to replace a Canon G10) I am still getting used to it.I haven't checked all the comments here, so excuse me if my comment has already been covered. I went to Best Buy today to purchase the Sony RX100 III today as I am taking a nice trip tomorrow. The rear display is a 3-inch LCD panel with a 1,228k-dot resolution. If you prefer an optical viewfinder, the Fujifilm X20 ( at Amazon) is a good alternative. It’s also very well made. Reason for this camera was primary 30x zoom. The new canon easily beats it in features and usefulness. I use it when I don't carry my 5DII around as it is pocketable. The RX100 II comes into play at 28mm, and it's actually effectively 'faster' than both the G1 X II and RX100 III at first. So I sold it and looking for a small camera with sensor of one inch at least, I read enthusiast reviews of Sony RX100.M3 that I bought. The Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* lens covers a 24-70mm (35mm equivalent) field of view at an f/1.8-2.8 variable aperture. Since the original release of the Sony RX100 back in 2012, the company has been pushing updates to the camera and releasing one new iteration every year. Find out which one is the right fit. Flash diffuser question -- I have been using the original RX-100 since it came out, and have found that it takes great pictures, but using the flash indoors never produces good pictures unless (1) I bend the flash back (which sometimes works if the distances and angles work out correctly, but sometimes produces unevenly lit or underexposed pictures) or (2) I use a Ping-Pong ball that I have cut open so that I can fit it over the flash as a diffuser (which actually works pretty well, but I always have to explain and defend why I'm fooling with a Ping-Pong ball). So when will you see this benefit? Had a chance to use one for a couple of days. There's a lot more to the RX100 III than just the lens and EVF, though - especially when it comes to video. I complemented my new purchase with a remote and the flash unit accessory. The M3 is the last android (The UI is all Sony) based model of the range so it doesn't have the same options as later models. This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. Shop for sony rx100 iii at Best Buy. I used Imatest to check the sharpness of images captured by the RX100 III's 24-70mm lens and 20-megapixel image sensor.